Vulnerable Convenience: The Validity of Digital Agreements in Online Lending under Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code

Authors

Keywords:

Digital Agreement, Online Lending, Electronic Contract

Abstract

The rapid development of online lending has transformed the formation of loan agreements from conventional arrangements into electronic contracts. This development raises questions about whether the convenience of electronic contracting continues to satisfy the validity requirements under Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. This study aims to examine the validity of digital agreements in online lending by assessing the requirements of consent, legal capacity, a certain subject matter, and a lawful cause. This study employed normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials included the Indonesian Civil Code, Law No. 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 40 of 2024 concerning Information Technology-Based Joint Funding Services. The materials were analyzed qualitatively through a two-dimensional framework of formal and substantive validity. The study found that electronic mechanisms provide a legal basis for formal validity, particularly in establishing consent and identifying the subject matter of the agreement. However, substantive validity depends on the legal capacity of the parties, the legality of the provider, and the lawful cause of the agreement. The three regulatory instruments therefore operate in a complementary but partially congruent framework.The study contributes a two-dimensional framework for assessing digital loan agreements by connecting general contract validity under Article 1320 with electronic transaction and sector-specific regulations. The framework strengthens theoretical analysis of electronic contracts and provides a practical basis for providers and regulators to ensure that technological convenience is accompanied by substantive legal compliance.

Author Biographies

  • Erna Rahma Balgis, Trisakti University

    Erna Rahma Balgis is affiliated with the Faculty of Law, Trisakti University, Indonesia. Her academic specialization is Civil Law, with research interests in civil law and related legal studies.

  • Zhang Liangfei, Henan Medical University

    Zhang Liangfei is a Lecturer at North Henan Medical University, China. His academic specialization is Business Administration, with research interests in business management and related interdisciplinary studies.

References

Ali, Z. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Anastasia, D. S. (2023). Urgensi Pembentukan Hukum Fintech Untuk Memberi Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Konsumen Dalam Pinjaman Online. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i02.227

Andayani, T. A. (2025). Pengawasan Transaksi Pinjaman Online Oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Berdasarkan POJK Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 Tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.46839/consensus.v4i1.1454

Falaq, M. R. I., & Multazam, M. T. (2024). Pentingnya Sertifikasi Tanda Tangan Elektronik pada Pinjaman Online. Journal Customary Law, 1(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47134/jcl.v1i3.2957

Farhan, I. A., & Kafi, M. S. (2023). Peranan Pelaksanaan Asas Iktikad Baik dalam Hukum Perjanjian. JIRS, 1(2), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v1i2.391

Firdaus, R. M. F., Noerzein, A., & Wafa, E. A. (2022). Legalitas Tanda Tangan Elektronik sebagai Bentuk Otoritas dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan. Jurnal MAHUPAS: Mahasiswa Hukum Unpas, 1(2), 31–48.

Gunawan, A., Zuhrah, & Didik, I. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Pinjaman Online di Indonesia. As-Syar ’ i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 7(4), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.47476/assyari.v7i4.9449

Guspitawaty, E., & Santiago, F. (2023). Responsibility ff The Notary to The Parties in Terms of Binding Purchase Agreement (PPJB) Based on Their Legal Analysis No Title. Journal of World Science, 2(4), 508–512. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i4.278

Handayani, P., Arianto, D., & Sazani. (2024). Legality of Electronic Contracts in the Context of Good Faith Principle Application in E-Commerce Transactions within the Modern Economy: A Review Based on Wilstheorie. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v20i2.11509

Hartati, R., & Syafrida. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Nasabah Pinjaman Online Ilegal (Pinjol Ilegal). Otentik’s: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.35814/otentik.v4i2.3737

Hermawan, R. O., Adolf, H., & Santoso, E. (2024). Kajian Hukum Penerapan Pasal dalam Kontrak Elektronik. Iustitia Omnibus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.70825/iustitia.v5i2.100

Hidayah, A. (2021). Asas Iktikad Baik dalam Kontrak Elektronik. Solusi, 19(2), 155-164 ASAS. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v19i2.361

Hidayatulloh, T. N., & Arifin, T. (2026). Pinjaman Online dalam Perspektif Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata dan Hadits Riwayat Imam Bukhori No.2085 dan Imam Muslim No.1598. Journal of Literature Review, 1(1), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.63822/bf910z28

Irianto, S. (2024). Validity of Contracts in the Digital Era in Indonesia. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 5808–5817. https://doi.org/10.61707/7q34h809

Khaerunnisa, R. (2025). OJK: Ada 20 perusahaan “fintech lending” dengan TWP90 di atas 5 persen. ANTARA. https://m.antaranews.com/amp/berita/4779685/ojk-ada-20-perusahaan-fintech-lending-dengan-twp90-di-atas-5-persen

Kiswah, M., Wibisono, W. F. R., Setyawan, F., & Adonara, F. F. (2025). Keabsahan Perjanjian Elektronik dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Debitur Pinjaman Online. Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif, 16(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v16i2.128

Kurniawan, N., & Putri, M. C. (2022). DIGITAL CONSTITUTIONALISM ERA IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF BANKING LAW IN INDONESIA. Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions, 1(3), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i3.29

Lermansyah, A., Astanti, D. I., & Heryanti, B. R. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen dalam Jasa Layanan Keuangan (Digital Financial Technology). Semarang Law Review (SLR), 4(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v4i1.6590

Lubis, M. A., & Putra, M. F. M. (2022). Peer To Peer ( P2P ) Lending : Hubungan Hukum Peer To Peer ( P2P ) Lending : Legal Relationship of Parties , Risk of Default , and Legality. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 5(1), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4896

Martinelli, I., Sugiawan, F. A., & Zulianty, R. (2024). Kepastian Hukum Kontrak Elektronik Dalam Pinjaman Online Berdasarkan Hukum Perikatan. JAMPARING: Jurnal Akuntansi Manajemen Pariwisata dan Pembelajaran Konseling, 2(2), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.57235/jamparing.v2i2.2922

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Mulyadi, Y., Aziz, H., & Myranika, A. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Pinjaman Online Dikaitkan dengan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata Tentang Keabsahan Perjanjian Kontrak. Jurnal Pemandhu, 5(1), 69–85.

Nasrullah, Hidayah, Y., & Machmud, A. (2025). Penerapan Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali dalam Penetapan Tanggal Efektif Akuisisi: Studi Kasus Putusan KPPU No. 02/KPPU-M/2018. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP), 6(1), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6036

Nicholas, J. (2025). Keabsahan Perjanjian dan Kedudukan Pinjaman Online Illegal sebagai Kreditur dalam Kepailitan. The Juris, 9(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v9i1.1568

Nurhilmiyah, & Purba, H. (2022). Klausula Eksonerasi Pada Perjanjian Pinjaman Online Nurhilmiyah1,. Acta Law Journal, 1(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.32734/alj.v1i1.10014

Nurhisyam, F., Sudiro, A. A., & Machmud, A. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Kode Etik Penagihan Pada Fintech P2P Lending Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen. Journal Syntax Idea, 6(2), 888–899. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i2.3013

Nurmawanadilah, D. (2024). Kekuatan Pembuktian Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Suatu Kontrak Individual. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal (MIJ), 2(6), 1490–1497.

Putra, A. H., & Waluyo. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pinjaman Online Berkeadilan dan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 11(1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v11i1.68284

Risal, A. (2024). Legal Protection for Debtors in Online Transactions: Evaluating Safeguards in E-Commerce. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 7(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v7i2.11656

Senda, V. N., Sopiani, S., & Muzzamil, M. F. (2024). Implikasi Hukum Ketidakterpenuhan Syarat Subjektif dalam Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata terhadap Keabsahan Perjanjian. LETTERLIJK, 1(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.25134/letterlijk.v1i2.109

Septiari, N. L. G. M., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2025). Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Elektronik dalam Perspektif KUH Perdata dan UU ITE. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i4.4320

Simamora, P. N. S., Ginting, G., Rantung, C. M. M., Kaunang, P. D., & Dewi, P. M. (2025). Legal Implications of Electronic Contracts in Civil Law: A Case Study in the Digital Era. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(3), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i3.1272

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatis Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sukma, S. (2025). Legalitas Tanda Tangan Digital Dalam Konteks Perjanjian. Nomos: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v5i2.2705

Sulistyaningrum, H. P. (2024). E-contract Consensus in Indonesian Contract Law. Batulis Civil Law Review, 5(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v5i2.1930

Suyadi, Wiwiek, Y. H., Sulistyandari, Muksinun, & Sukirman. (2022). Kosmik Hukum. Kosmik Hukum, 22(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i3.13142

Syaiful, R. D., & Sugiyono, H. (2024). Misuse of Consumer Personal Data Through Illegal Fintech Peer To Peer Lending. JUSTISI, 10(1), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i1.3003

Vebriani, S., & Danyathi, A. P. L. (2025). Keabsahan Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui E-Commerce di Indonesia: Perlindungan Konsumen dan UU ITE. Jurnal Kertha Desa, 13(10), 1008–1020.

Wafda, A. T. K., & Setyowati, R. (2022). Implementation of the Principle of Good Faith in the Sharia Financial Technology Contract of PT. Qazwa Mitra Hasanah. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 05(10), 4780–4784. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-52

Zulkifli, Karmilia, R., & Nofrizal. (2025). Aspek Hukum Transaksi Elektronik pada Digital Banking dan Financial Technology. Andrew Law Journal, 4(1), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.61876/alj.v4i1.158

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

Vulnerable Convenience: The Validity of Digital Agreements in Online Lending under Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. (2026). Journal of Law and Resilient Future, 1(1), 59-75. https://journal.dealingspublishing.com/index.php/JLRF/article/view/31

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.